The Globalism Time Machine

JUN 04, 2024
The Globalism Time Machine
Whether they realize it or not, globalists’ plans will bring the world back in time to a period known as feudalism. Feudalism was a social, political, and economic system that existed in Europe in the Middle Ages, roughly the 5th to 12th centuries. During that time land ownership and power were concentrated in the hands of a few, the nobility. However, the existence of that hierarchical structure depended on the peasants who tilled the land and supplied the food and necessities for the elite. Not only did they supply all that the nobility needed in their daily lives, but they also fought and died in the wars that the nobility conducted in order to increase their power, influence and wealth. The system was rigid and there was very little upward mobility. The peasants frequently did not even own the land they worked on until the day they died. There are many reasons why feudalism eventually came to an end, but one of the major ones was the signing of the Magna Carter in the year 1215 in England. Rebellious barons who contested the overwhelming power of King John forced him to sign this document which made the king also subject to the rule of law. It upheld the rights of merchants, noblemen, and clergymen as a protection against the whims of the king. It also gave the king’s subjects the right to remove him if he did not obey the charter. Most importantly, it outlawed imprisonment without trial. At first, the Magna Carta only protected the rights of noblemen and clergymen. However, its protections would eventually be extended to the common people as well. By limiting the monarch’s power and guaranteeing certain individual rights, the foundations of democracy as we know it today were laid. So much so that by 1775 the American Revolution began because the monarchy in Great Britian was violating, the principles laid down in the Magna Carter. Thus, the American Democracy was born. The cornerstone of which is individual rights. The Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution are simply natural extensions of the Magna Carter. So how does globalism relate to all of this?
Globalism is a movement that seeks to concentrate power in the hands of the few just like feudalism concentrated power in the hands of the nobility. Globalism strives to tell you what is good for you instead of you determining that yourself. This is done in the name of improving society, but in so doing it takes away control over oneself. It deprives you of deciding what is good for you and your family. Individual rights, which were so hard won in the past, are taken away from us in the name of uniformity and obedience to the ruling class who know best what is good for us. How does this new ruling class know what is good for us? They don’t know. They simply say they do and expect us to believe them without question. To question them becomes criminal because they control the system. We see this encroachment on personal freedoms happening all around us incrementally but relentlessly. The examples of this are there in front of us, but most of us tend to either ignore the signs or fail to see the consequences of our inaction. So, let’s look at some examples of this to see how power over us is being usurped by an oligarchy in medicine, government and business slowly, and sometimes not so slowly, taking control of us.
First, let’s look at medicine. There is an effort underway to have the World Health Organization dictate to every country how it should handle the next pandemic and health issues in general. This could be and probably would be catastrophic. Control such as that being suggested would stifle independent scientific thought by concentrating too much power in one organization. Science thrives on diversity of thought not uniformity of thought. Contrary to what people like Dr. Fauci, who says “I am science,” believe, arrogance is not part of scientific investigation. The World Health Organization should certainly be investigating and making recommendations regarding health issues, but it should not be an enforcement agency. To have a world agency that might be directly or indirectly influenced by one country’s political elite, or another would be foolhardy at best. We are a diverse world population and thankfully so. What is good for one country may not be good for another. What is good for one state may not be good for another. Government, even in terms of health care, should be as local as possible with local leaders making decisions about health care with the best information possible. Globalism in health care means that an agency not familiar with the needs of your community makes decisions for you and your community. International health agencies such as the World Health Organization should study, report and make recommendations, but leave decision masking to local government. Globalism wants much more than that. Globalism wants control over those beneath them just like the nobility of medieval times wanted control over their peasants’ lives.
Next let’s look at globalism in terms of your day-to-day life and see how it compares to feudal times. In feudal times a peasant was bound to the land essentially as a serf. You could not leave without the permission of the lord. You were usually not allowed to own your land. Today with the trend toward globalism you would essentially be bound to the state. Many globalists hold China up as a model of efficiency. In China, social credit scores may determine what type of apartment you live in and where. It may also determine what you can buy, what you can eat and keep track of everything you spend. This does not look much different than what was going on in the Middle Ages. There is a trend today underfoot in this country to tell us what we can eat, how we can cook, what we can drive, and where we can live. All this under the purview of the government knowing what is best for us. How is this any better than the Middle Ages which attitude at best was paternalistic and at worst slave-like?
Finally, let us look at the economy itself. In the feudalism of the Middle Ages all wealth was in the hands of just a few people, essentially the nobility. Where are we headed today in that regard? More and more wealth is being concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer people, the new nobility or oligarchy of the new world order. The gap between the super-rich and the middle class, also known as the working class, is getting wider and wider. Fewer and fewer middle class working people can look forward to buying their own homes. That old American Dream, which drove the United States to greater and greater prosperity for all its people is fast fading away. In many instances they cannot even look forward to a peaceful, enjoyable retirement because they will not be able to afford it while the rich get richer. Communism or socialism is not the answer to this problem. That only concentrates more resources in the hands of the elite and the oligarchy in charge of the government. Independence and self-determination are the answers. Work hard for yourself and enjoy the fruits of your labors unrestricted by a government that only sees you as resource for the government and the new nobility. Some people will say “what about those who for some reason can’t achieve or thrive?” For those Americans who truly have problems or limitations preventing them from doing so there will always be a “safety net” because the real American People are not mean spirited or uncaring. Their generosity has never been found wanting. What has been found wanting oftentimes is the capacity of government to achieve that protection and provide for its citizens as it was intended to do. This can be remedied not by globalism but by restoring power back to its foundations, the people closest to the problems.
Globalism brings us back in time to the Middle Ages. It does not bring us to a happier or more prosperous future.